Steward Hall, as a cultural critic, was interested in the material forces that drive culture. This links him to Marx. He differed from Marx, however, in the fact that he strove to “move intellectual and political paradigms from a sole focus on economic factors to a more complex understanding of the multiple determinants of people’s allegiances, attitudes, and beliefs” (1779).
As I read the Norton introduction says, his “founding work in cultural studies characteristically came to the world in the form of edited volumes in which eight to twelve authors address a topic, arguing with each other but also moving toward and overarching delineation of the factors that need to be considered if the topic is to be adequately analyzed” (1779). This sense of conversation is necessary to the whole idea of cultural criticism. Culture is always changing because people are constantly contributing to it. For this reason, cultural criticism will never contain an axiom. It will always be a growing collection of conversations encompassing more and more factors that determine and are determined by culture.
Cultural criticism will also always resist definition because it is a criticism of criticism, which changes with every critique. Hall deals with the politics of theory, a politics that inevitably changes as it is described.
Another interesting factor of cultural criticism is that it necessarily shifts the critical focus from the high art of modernism to the things that most influence the public. This means that the critical focus is on the utterances of popular culture, namely, contemporary art, especially video and other emerging urban art forms.
His focus on materialism and progressive conversation has a hint (or more) of Hegel in it (not a surprise). He seems to understand Hegel better than Hegel understood himself, because he knows that his thinking will not lead to a definitive answer. He actually calls himself a police of the theory, making sure that it never becomes conclusive. Thus, his work is “self-consciously nondogmatic, restless, and open to new ideas and changing social conditions” (1779).
Hall’s notion that art is not merely a cultural production but also a cultural determinant provides a sense of political hope. This opens the door for artists like Banksy to change the way a culture thinks. Banksy is outside of the economic structure, even undermining it by using vandalism as an art medium. This fits with the Cultural Critic’s fears of institutionalization.
British graffiti artist Banksy is a cultural critic, wrestling with many of the same tensions that Hall describes.
Hall focuses on a very concrete example of the tensions of cultural criticism: AIDS. “It’s a site at which not only people will die, but desire and pleasure will also die if certain metaphors do not survive, or survive in the wrong way. Unless we operate in this tension, we don’t know what cultural studies can do. It has to analyze certain things about the constitutive and political nature of representation itself, about its complexities, about the effects of language, about textuality as a site of life and death” (1793).
Banksy’s work is very explicitly a site of life and death. He deals with the weight of culture, but also has a rebellious sense of humor. You can tell that sometimes he is just being creative, making something different out of what is already there. On the other side of the coin, he generates disturbing social commentary by juxtaposing images of children with soldiers, weapons, or machinery.
“It [cultural criticism] constantly allows the one [political tension] to irritate, bother, and disturb the other [theoretical tension], without insisting on some final theoretical closure” (1792).
The playfulness of his work is subversive, opening up potentially new meanings for the things that he marks such as this elephant.
"The human race is an unfair and stupid competition. A lot of the runners don't even get decent sneakers or clean drinking water. Some people are born with a massive head start, every possible help along the way and still the referees seem to be on their side. It's not surprising some people have given up competing altogether and gone to sit in the grandstand, eat junk food and shout abuse. What we need in this race is a lot more streakers." –Banksy
This quote shows a theoretical view of language, by recognizing the deconstructive pun in the word “race.” At the same time it is a decisive political commentary, suggesting a propositional meaning.
What interests me most about the selection we read, “Cultural Studies and Its Theoretical Legacies,” is the fact that it is an analysis of the development of theory itself as a cultural utterance. This mixing between theoretical and artistic practice opens up the door for us to analyze art itself as a kind of cultural theoretical practice. Art is a criticism of culture that is produced by the culture.
Banksy isn't completely outside of institutions either. Fox recruited him to write an opening for the Simpsons, which critiqued Fox. They used 95% of his material despite its politics because, like Banksy, they have a sense of humor that is on the edge.
Interestingly, though, the Simpsons is pretty mainstream, which Hebdige would say makes it less interesting, and I agree. As it grew in popularity, it started becoming even more outrageous and critical but it also becomes less shocking and pushes the boundaries less. It wasn't that long ago that one of the characters was pronounced a lesbian, and this was meant to shock audiences. I don't watch the Simpsons at all any more and when i did I didn't watch it closely enough to totally ratify this statement, but I'm fairly certain it's true: Before that, there were no main characters, and possibly no minor characters (especially ones we were supposed to like) who were gay. I think there was one old man who was kind of weird and creepy. Yet, despite starting later and being less known for controversiality, Will and Grace had been talking about homosexuality for some time before The Simpsons started talking about it. Maybe this is because homosexuality isn't the issue the Simpsons is most concerned with. But it certainly seems interesting that a show known for controversy is without gay characters for the most part. Another example of how the show becomes less interesting as it becomes more mainstream is the character of Ralph Wiggins. He is the actual name of a trope on tvtropes.org for his stupidity. Originally however, tvtropes says, he was an interestingly complex character who had a hidden talent for acting. The character became caricatured as time went on, however. This is also an interesting idea when related to the simulacrum, because as Ralph became familiar to the audience, he lost most of his actual character and became a cardboard cut-out.
ReplyDelete(for more info on this process, see: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Flanderization. I think the image does a really good job of displaying the idea).
So on a second thought, I don't really believe that what Banksy is doing is really cultural criticism. In a lot of ways his rebellion against the culture is determined by the culture. Many people already think war is bad or that we are too industrialized. For the most park Banksy is funny and subversive, but he is hardly a theorist. Just a guy who looks at the world with a creative eye, sometimes making things pretty, sometimes pointing out how ugly they are.
ReplyDeleteIt would be more interesting to look at what the historical forces are that drive his art. He is political in the sense that he takes a stand against political action, but he does not actually do anything decisive. Politics involves what Hall calls an "arbitrary closure,"--and not a permanent one--but Banksy merely reopens the closures that already exist.
Cultural criticism also pays attention to notions of power. Banksy's form of expression actually shows a lack of political power. He cannot be political, but only undermine politics because as an artist he has very little power. This is similar to the way that Hall laments the lack of power that even cultural criticism has to change the world, yet they must persist in making voices heard.
The one decisive political act that Banksy does take is on his assertion that the world should be more beautiful. He takes a step and makes it that way.
I would agree with your "second thought". I was trying to figure out how to express this exact criticism of your argument, but you did it for me. :)
ReplyDeleteYeah, I knew it was contrived when I wrote it, but I felt like I just needed to post it and then think about it later.
ReplyDeleteJacqui,
ReplyDeleteBut all of this is what makes cultural theory so potent. And, I do think this is what makes Hall worth reading. Really, we can only look at one "crisis" at a time, and so the "crisis" can be a frame for the interplay of various cultural forces and movements.