Tuesday, March 15, 2011

TGIF

I'm sure you've all heard, or heard of, by now Rebecca Black's new classic "Friday."  A great deal of recent scholarship has been devoted toward analyzing and deciphering this complex, deeply layered work of art--and it is a work of art; my only question is how to classify it: is it poetry, or is it symphony?  Setting those questions aside, however, it is clear that this song demands interpretation.  Specifically, Freudian interpretation.


Like Oedipus’s tragic plight, which holds universal among the sexual urges of men, so too must Black’s “legend must include horror and self-punishment” 817).  Hence, Black must submit herself to the self-inflicted punishment that comes from lack of sleep and early rising (“Seven a.m., waking up in the morning”).  However, Black goes on: “Gotta be fresh, gotta go downstairs / Gotta have my bowl, gotta have cereal.”  Clearly, “bowl” is cryptographic for the phallus.  As evidence for this, we need only consider the phallic shape of the spoon and the act of oral ingestion, along with the sexual connotation of the word “spoon” itself.

After succumbing to her oral desires (which are, of course, never fully satisfied [1161]), Black goes “downstairs” (note the sexual imagery here)  in order to hurry to the bus stop: “Seein' everything, the time is goin’ / Tickin' on and on, everybodys rushin’ / Gotta get down to the bus stop / Gotta catch my bus, I see my friends (My friends).”

Black is forced to hurry for two reasons.  First and foremost her desire for the phallus (which the shape of the bus represents), for which her desire has already been exacerbated due to the sexual frustration she experienced while eating breakfast.  The second reason Black hurried can be traced the clear penis-envy that she has for her friends.  Even though going to school is clearly unpleasant, her Id nevertheless drives her toward the bus stop, where she can demonstrate that her phallus measures up to those surrounding her—in order that she might become the Phallus Queen.

Black, however, ultimately turns down the bus.  This is because the bus, as a sexual object, represented “the last moment in which the [sexual object] could have been regarded as phallic” (843).  The bus, then, is merely a fetish, or “a substitute of the penis” (842).  More importantly, however, the bus is a substitute for a “particular and quite special penis that had been extremely important in early childhood but had later been lost” (842).  Such a penis “should have been given up, but the fetish is precisely designed to preserve it from extinction” (842).

Black’s friends—forever the scotimizers—arrive to draw Black away from the object of her desire; in doing so, however, they merely reinforce the preexisting phallic-desire and penis-envy that drew Black to the bus stop in the first place.  Note the camera lingers upon the adolescent, Beiber-esque male in the back seat: he flips his hair, and Black enters the car, implying a sexual invitation and acceptance.  Specifically, the boy introduces yet another fetish (coupeur de nattes) when he does so, as he has unconsciously linked a desire to the new perversion of hair-cutting.  In essence, he is inviting Black to cut his hair with sexual vigor.

With that, Black sings “Yesterday was Thursday, Thursday / Today i-is Friday, Friday (Partyin) / We-we-we so excited / We so excited / We gonna have a ball today.”  In this case, Black is regressing to a childlike stage of development; when faced with the prospect of sexual arousal, she returns to such elementary teachings as the days of the week.  This is further cemented by the sexual imagery in her language (“wee-wee” and “ball”—note too the immediacy and urgency of the latter, which must be had today).

Clearly, posting this on YouTube was a tormented cry of sexual repression.  And yet, at the same time, she “doesn’t want this weekend to end.”  In addition, although Black is outwardly female, her lyrics clearly suggest an Oedipal, and therefore masculine—perspective on reality.  It must be concluded, therefore, that Black is also a hermaphrodite.  Alert the Internet.

4 comments:

  1. Wow. What a terrible song! This post made me laugh a lot, especially this part: "the sexual frustration she experienced while eating breakfast." Not sure why, but it struck me funny. Some of the examples, like "downstairs," for instance felt contrived as I read, but as I continue to think about the video in Freudian terms I can't quite get away from that interpretation (Freud is like that. It never seems to fit at first, but it's hard to get away from once you've gone there. Could that mean he's right? Is that really what our id wants to see. Once we give it what we want it won't go away. Awful. I don't think I totally disagree with Freud, but I will never understand why we listen to him. Why do I want to get up close and personal with my id? I am happier just not going there. Okay. Rant over.) I certainly agree that her reverting to child language shows how she is letting go of the superstructure, which keeps her desires in check. Then she doesn't want the weekend to end. It wasn't enough to satisfy the insatiable desires of the id. And it never would be.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bridger,
    Great attempt to elevate a pretty awful example of pop culture. I think you should share your Lacanian reading w/ her. I doubt that she'd appreciate it, though.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bridger,

    I just want to know why on earth you are willing to admit you were listening to this song in the first place. Or willing to spend so much time analyzing it. I listened to it with Jacquie just now and I'm pretty sure my eardrums will never recover.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think this exactly exemplifies both how easy it is to apply Freud to anything (perhaps giving him some validity) and just how ridiculous it can get (perhaps giving him some invalidity). It might be important to recall that even if something seems ridiculous doesn't make it untrue-- the video actually does seem to be about sexuality in some sense, at least in that it is about partying which derives most of its excitement around sexual intrigue. At the same time, this analysis could reveal how, even though something can be applied (and make sense when applied) doesn't mean that it should.

    ReplyDelete